On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 16:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:53:17AM +0000, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> > I can see crashes with LLSC enabled in both SMP running on 4 cores
> > and SMP running on 1 core.
>
> So you're running on LL/SC enabled hardware; that would make Will's
> patch irrelevant (although still a good idea for the hardware that does
> care about that spinlocked atomic crud).
>
> Does something like the below cure things? That would confirm the
> suggestion that the change to __clear_bit_unlock() is the curprit.
I tested it - this doesn't change anything, the problem still reproduces.
I'll test it with last Will fix.
> If that doesn't cure things, then we've been looking in entirely the
> wrong place.
>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h b/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
> index 3ae021368f48..79c6978152f8 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
> @@ -57,12 +57,7 @@ static inline void clear_bit_unlock(unsigned int nr, volatile unsigned long *p)
> static inline void __clear_bit_unlock(unsigned int nr,
> volatile unsigned long *p)
> {
> - unsigned long old;
> -
> - p += BIT_WORD(nr);
> - old = READ_ONCE(*p);
> - old &= ~BIT_MASK(nr);
> - atomic_long_set_release((atomic_long_t *)p, old);
> + clear_bit_unlock(nr, p);
> }
>
> /**
--
Eugeniy Paltsev
