Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] hugetlb: Factorize hugetlb architecture primitives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mike,

Thanks for your review. I'm going to fix the 2nd patch as you said, you're right, no need to move the #include at the bottom of the file.
I'm going to post a v5, add -mm in cc and ask for inclusion in their tree.

Thanks again for your time,

Alex


On 07/26/2018 09:16 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 07/26/2018 04:46 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

On 07/20/2018 11:37 AM, Alex Ghiti wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestion about those patches ?
I only took a quick look.  From the hugetlb perspective, I like the
idea of moving routines to a common file.  If any of the arch owners
(or anyone else) agree, I can do a review of the series.
The conversions look pretty good to me. If you want to give it a review
then from my point of view it could go in -mm to shake out any bugs.
Nothing of significance found in a review.  As others have suggested,
the (cross)compiler may be better at finding issues than human eyes.

I also suggest it be added to -mm.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux