Re: [PATCH V2 16/19] csky: SMP support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 01:30:19AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> +static irqreturn_t handle_ipi(int irq, void *dev)
> +{
> +	unsigned long *pending_ipis = &ipi_data[smp_processor_id()].bits;
> +
> +	while (true) {
> +		unsigned long ops;
> +
> +		/* Order bit clearing and data access. */
> +		mb();
> +
> +		ops = xchg(pending_ipis, 0);
> +		if (ops == 0)
> +			return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +
> +		if (ops & (1 << IPI_RESCHEDULE))
> +			scheduler_ipi();
> +
> +		if (ops & (1 << IPI_CALL_FUNC))
> +			generic_smp_call_function_interrupt();
> +
> +		BUG_ON((ops >> IPI_MAX) != 0);
> +
> +		/* Order data access and bit testing. */
> +		mb();
> +	}
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static void (*send_arch_ipi)(const unsigned long *mask, unsigned long irq) = NULL;
> +
> +void __init set_send_ipi(void (*func)(const unsigned long *, unsigned long))
> +{
> +	if (send_arch_ipi)
> +		return;
> +
> +	send_arch_ipi = func;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +send_ipi_message(const struct cpumask *to_whom, enum ipi_message_type operation)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	mb();
> +	for_each_cpu(i, to_whom)
> +		set_bit(operation, &ipi_data[i].bits);
> +
> +	mb();
> +	send_arch_ipi(cpumask_bits(to_whom), IPI_IRQ);
> +}


Please explain those mb()'s... I'm thinking you meant to use smp_mb().

But then for handle_ipi(), the xchg() should already imply all those.
And the send_ipi_message() only needs the second.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux