Re: [PATCH v13 24/24] selftests/vm: test correct behavior of pkey-0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>, shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 24/24] selftests/vm: test correct behavior of pkey-0
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 08:22:05 -0700
Cc: mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx, bauerman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx, msuchanek@xxxxxxx, aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1528937115-10132-25-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
References: <1528937115-10132-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> <1528937115-10132-25-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

On 06/13/2018 05:45 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> Ensure pkey-0 is allocated on start.  Ensure pkey-0 can be attached
> dynamically in various modes, without failures.  Ensure pkey-0 can be
> freed and allocated.

I like this.  Looks very useful.

Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v13 00/24] selftests, powerpc, x86 : Memory Protection Keys
  - From: Ram Pai
- [PATCH v13 24/24] selftests/vm: test correct behavior of pkey-0
  - From: Ram Pai

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v13 22/24] selftests/vm: testcases must restore pkey-permissions
Next by Date: [PATCH v4 0/7] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
Previous by thread: [PATCH v13 24/24] selftests/vm: test correct behavior of pkey-0
Next by thread: [PATCH v13 23/24] selftests/vm: sub-page allocator
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Newbies] [x86 Platform Driver] [Netdev] [Linux Wireless] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux Filesystems] [Yosemite Discussion] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]