On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 09:40:02AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Peterz, isn't there some fancy better way we're supposed to handle the > error return these days? Don't think so. I played with a few things but that never really went anywhere. Also, both asm things look suspicously similar, it might make sense to share. Also, maybe do the instruction .byte sequence in a #define INSN or something.