On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This introduces the core part of support for early platform drivers > and devices. > It looks like most of your prep patches are to separate the alloc and init of platform devices because you are essentially making early devices/drivers a sub-class. Maybe you could avoid doing that and simplify things a bit. Comments below based on doing that... > +/** > + * struct early_platform_driver > + * > + * @pdrv: real platform driver associated with this early platform driver > + * @list: list head for the list of early platform drivers > + * @early_probe: early probe callback > + */ > +struct early_platform_driver { > + struct platform_driver pdrv; > + struct list_head list; Couldn't you use an existing list in driver_private until you move over to the normal bus infra. > + int (*early_probe)(struct platform_device *); Just add this to platform_driver. > +}; > + > +/** > + * struct early_platform_device > + * > + * @pdev: real platform device associated with this early platform device > + * @list: list head for the list of early platform devices > + * @deferred: true if this device's early probe was deferred > + * @deferred_drv: early platform driver with which this device was matched > + */ > +struct early_platform_device { > + struct platform_device pdev; > + struct list_head list; Use a list in device_private? > + bool deferred; > + struct early_platform_driver *deferred_drv; Can't you use the existing deferred probe list? Rob