On 05/03/2018 01:38 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
This is a new requirement that I was not aware off. Its not documented anywhere AFAICT.
Correct. All inheritance behavior was deliberately left unspecified.I'm surprised about the reluctance to fix the x86 behavior. Are there any applications at all for the current semantics?
I guess I can implement this particular glibc hardening on POWER only for now.
Thanks, Florian