On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 9:24 AM, James Hogan <jhogan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 06:40:07PM -0400, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:51 PM, James Hogan <jhogan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> While I haven't looked at the individual changes, I wonder whether >> it would be useful to make this new ABI use 64-bit time_t from >> the start, using the new system calls that Deepa and I have been >> posting recently. > > Personally I'm all for squeezing as much API cleanup in as possible > before its merged, though obviously there'll be a point when the ABI may > need to be frozen, at which point we'll mostly have to accept what we > have within reason. > >> There are still a few things to be worked out: >> only the first of four sets of syscall patches is merged so far, >> and we have a couple of areas that will require further ABI changes >> (sound, sockets, media and maybe a couple of smaller drivers), >> so it depends on the overall timing. If you would otherwise merge >> the patches quickly, then it may be better to just follow the existing >> 32-bit architectures and add the 64-bit entry points when we do it >> for everyone. > > I think it'll likely be a couple of cycles before it gets merged anyway. > There's still work to do, and limited resources. Ok, let's plan on getting the 64-bit time_t ABIs in place early enough then. We will likely have very similar timing for the upcoming rv32 ABI on arch/riscv. Arnd