Re: [uml-devel] [REVIEW][PATCH 19/22] signal/um: Use force_sig_fault in relay_signal.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



And once more in plain text..

On 25 April 2018 at 01:00, Martin Pärtel <martin.partel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This was ages ago, but from what I remember...
>
>>
>> Having a second look I really don't understand what relay_signal is
>> trying to do.
>>
>> The function relay_signal does not pass siginfo through unchanged.
>
>
> Just copying the entire struct would do the wrong thing. It was discussed here:
> https://marc.info/?l=user-mode-linux-devel&m=133910707911999&w=2
>
>>
>> Am I missing something subtle or have the subtle details of siginfo just
>> always been ignored?
>
>
> My guess is they have. I was almost certainly oblivious to such subtleties when writing my commit.
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux