Hi Peter,
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 09:27 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 01:19:01PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > +CC Peter since we have his attention ;-)
>
> Yeah, timezone collision there, I typically sleep at 1am ;-)
>
> > On 03/01/2018 07:13 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > > Hi Vineet,
> > >
> > > Just noticed that in comments for smp_call_function_many() it is said that
> > > preemption must be disabled during its execution. And that function gets executed
> > > among other ways like that:
> > > -------------------------->8-----------------------
> > > flush_tlb_range()
> > > -> on_each_cpu_mask()
> > > -> smp_call_function_many()
> > > -------------------------->8-----------------------
> >
> > In general I prefer not to - Peter what say you ?
>
> The comment with smp_call_function_many() is correct, it relies on
> preemption being disabled in a number of ways. I would expect
> this_cpu_ptr() for example to complain when used with preemption
> enabled (CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT).
I just tried CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT and the only thing I got was that:
-------------------------->8-----------------------
ARC perf : 8 counters (32 bits), 32 conditions, [overflow IRQ support]
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1
caller is arc_pmu_device_probe+0x24e/0x29c
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.14.14+ #67
Stack Trace:
arc_unwind_core.constprop.1+0xd0/0xf4
dump_stack+0x64/0x7c
debug_smp_processor_id+0xb8/0xbc
arc_pmu_device_probe+0x24e/0x29c
platform_drv_probe+0x26/0x5c
really_probe+0x288/0x338
__driver_attach+0xc4/0xc8
bus_for_each_dev+0x38/0x70
bus_add_driver+0x12a/0x18c
driver_register+0x50/0xec
do_one_initcall+0x32/0x108
kernel_init_freeable+0xfe/0x188
-------------------------->8-----------------------
That happens because in PMU probe routine we want to
configure IRQ handlers on all other cores:
-------------------------->8-----------------------
arc_pmu_device_probe() ->
on_each_cpu(arc_cpu_pmu_irq_init, &irq, 1): preempt_disable() ->
enable_percpu_irq(irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE) ->
smp_processor_id() with disabled preemption.
-------------------------->8-----------------------
Which poses another preemption related question - how do IRQ setup on
all cores properly? :)
-Alexey
