Re: mm, x86, powerpc: pkey semantics for key-0 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/08/2018 10:25 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> Is there a reason why the default key; key-0, is not allowed to be
> explicitly associated with pages using pkey_mprotect()?

No, it's a bug if it is not permitted.  I have a vague recollection of
knowing about this and having a patch.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux