* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The syscall table base is a user controlled function pointer in kernel > space. Use 'array_idx' to prevent any out of bounds speculation. While > retpoline prevents speculating into a userspace directed target it does > not stop the pointer de-reference, the concern is leaking memory > relative to the syscall table base, by observing instruction cache > behavior. (The style problems/inconsistencies of the previous patches are repeated here too, please fix.) > > Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/entry/common.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c > index 03505ffbe1b6..f78bf8bfdfae 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ > #include <linux/export.h> > #include <linux/context_tracking.h> > #include <linux/user-return-notifier.h> > +#include <linux/nospec.h> > #include <linux/uprobes.h> > #include <linux/livepatch.h> > #include <linux/syscalls.h> > @@ -284,6 +285,7 @@ __visible void do_syscall_64(struct pt_regs *regs) > * regs->orig_ax, which changes the behavior of some syscalls. > */ > if (likely((nr & __SYSCALL_MASK) < NR_syscalls)) { > + nr = array_idx(nr & __SYSCALL_MASK, NR_syscalls); > regs->ax = sys_call_table[nr & __SYSCALL_MASK]( > regs->di, regs->si, regs->dx, > regs->r10, regs->r8, regs->r9); Btw., in the future we could optimize the 64-bit fastpath here, by doing something like: if (unlikely(nr >= NR_syscalls)) { nr = array_idx(nr, NR_syscalls); ... } else { if ((nr & __SYSCALL_MASK) < NR_syscalls) { ... X32 ABI ... } else { ... error ... } } This would remove 2-3 instructions from the 64-bit syscall fast-path I believe, by pushing the x32 details to a slow-path. But obviously that should not be part of the Spectre series. Thanks, Ingo