Re: [PATCH 4/5] Expand the INIT_SIGNALS and INIT_SIGHAND macros and remove

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, David Howells wrote:

> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > >  #define INIT_CPU_TIMERS(s)						\
> > ...
> > That macro is only used in init_task.c Why not moving it there and get rid
> > of the whole macro maze in the header file?
> 
> The reason I didn't get rid of it is that it's got more than one expansion
> point.  Same for INIT_PREV_CPUTIME and INIT_PID_LINK.

Ah, sorry I missed that. So yes, the current patch is fine.

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux