On 10/01/18 08:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
We'll need that name for a generic implementation soon.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
index f3a637b98487..6840426bbe77 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static int __swiotlb_dma_mapping_error(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t addr)
return 0;
}
-static const struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
+static const struct dma_map_ops arm64_swiotlb_dma_ops = {
.alloc = __dma_alloc,
.free = __dma_free,
.mmap = __swiotlb_mmap,
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent)
{
if (!dev->dma_ops)
- dev->dma_ops = &swiotlb_dma_ops;
+ dev->dma_ops = &arm64_swiotlb_dma_ops;
dev->archdata.dma_coherent = coherent;
__iommu_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_base, size, iommu);
