Re: [RFCv2 2/4] Documentation: document nospec helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/05/18 06:57, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Document the rationale and usage of the new nospec*() helpers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/speculation.txt | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 166 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/speculation.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/speculation.txt b/Documentation/speculation.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..748fcd4dcda4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/speculation.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
> +
> +Typically speculative execution cannot be observed from architectural state,
> +such as the contents of registers. However, in some cases it is possible to
> +observe its impact on microarchitectural state, such as the presence or
> +absence of data in caches. Such state may form side-channels which can be
> +observed to extract secret information.

I'm curious about what it takes to observe this...

or is that covered in the exploit papers?

thanks,
-- 
~Randy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux