Hi Arnd On 2017-09-05 at 17:11:50 +0200, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Including linux/vmalloc.h in asm-generic/io.h isn't necessary since none > > of the definitions are used in the header itself. Remove the include in > > order to avoid potential header dependency problems if other headers > > rely on implict inclusion of linux/vmalloc.h which means that changes > > there could break unrelated parts. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/asm-generic/io.h | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h > > index b4531e3b2120..d2d3bd163f5f 100644 > > --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h > > +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h > > @@ -764,7 +764,6 @@ static inline void iowrite64_rep(volatile void __iomem *addr, > > > > #ifdef __KERNEL__ > > > > -#include <linux/vmalloc.h> > > #define __io_virt(x) ((void __force *)(x)) > > > > #ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP > > This seems like a good idea in principle, but I think it needs to be tested > well before we apply it, to avoid breaking random drivers that forgot to > add their own includes of that header. > > I've added your patch to my testing queue, but not to the asm-generic > tree now. We should see if it leads to any randconfig build regressions > on the architectures I normally test. Did you see any other breakages caused by this patch in your testing queue besides the ones you alredy reported/fixed? Would this be something appropriate to submit during the next merge window? Or at least to be included in linux-next so it gets some more coverage? Thanks Tobias
