From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> The NCPFS code has some stale comments regarding ACCESS_ONCE() uses which were removed a long time ago. Let's remove the stale comments. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Petr Vandrovec <petr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ncpfs/dir.c | 9 --------- 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ncpfs/dir.c b/fs/ncpfs/dir.c index 088f52484d6e..72cfaa253a8f 100644 --- a/fs/ncpfs/dir.c +++ b/fs/ncpfs/dir.c @@ -119,10 +119,6 @@ static inline int ncp_case_sensitive(const struct inode *i) /* * Note: leave the hash unchanged if the directory * is case-sensitive. - * - * Accessing the parent inode can be racy under RCU pathwalking. - * Use ACCESS_ONCE() to make sure we use _one_ particular inode, - * the callers will handle races. */ static int ncp_hash_dentry(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *this) @@ -147,11 +143,6 @@ ncp_hash_dentry(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *this) return 0; } -/* - * Accessing the parent inode can be racy under RCU pathwalking. - * Use ACCESS_ONCE() to make sure we use _one_ particular inode, - * the callers will handle races. - */ static int ncp_compare_dentry(const struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int len, const char *str, const struct qstr *name) -- 2.5.2
