On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:15:25PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > ----- On Sep 26, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Shuah Khan shuahkhan@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers > > <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> ----- On Sep 26, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Shuah Khan shuahkhan@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Mathew, > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers > >>> <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> Test the new MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED and > >>>> MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED commands. > >>>> > >>>> Add checks expecting specific error values on system calls expected to > >>>> fail. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: Andrew Hunter <ahh@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: Maged Michael <maged.michael@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: gromer@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>> CC: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: Dave Watson <davejwatson@xxxxxx> > >>>> CC: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> CC: linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> --- > >>>> .../testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c | 109 > >>> > >>> Did you run get_maintainers script on this patch? I am curious why > >>> get_maintainers didn't include linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and > >>> shuah@xxxxxxxxxx > >> > >> My mistake. I'll add this script to my checklist before I send out > >> patches. > >> > >> If OK with you, I can just add the ML in CC here. > >> > > > > Please add everybody get_maintainers suggest for this patch as well. > > If this patch is going through linux-kselftest, you will have to resend the > > patch to me at some point, so I can pull it in. > > > > I am guessing this has dependency on the other patches in the series > > and will go through the primary tree. In that case CC is just fine and I will > > review it and Ack it. > > Indeed, it has a dependency on another patch part of this > series, which is aimed to go through Paul E. McKenney's tree. > > Adding Greg, Alice, and Paul Elder in CC as suggested by get_maintainers. > > Do you need me to re-send the series, or is this thread ok ? Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
