----- On Sep 21, 2017, at 8:13 AM, Peter Zijlstra peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 06:36:47PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> @@ -3373,6 +3362,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt) >> >> /* Also unlocks the rq: */ >> rq = context_switch(rq, prev, next, &rf); >> + membarrier_arch_sched_in(prev, next); > > That's wrong iirc; we just switched stacks, you cannot use @prev and > @next. Yes, it did indeed explode spectacularly at boot in testing. RFC v3 fixes that. Thanks, Mathieu > >> } else { >> rq->clock_update_flags &= ~(RQCF_ACT_SKIP|RQCF_REQ_SKIP); > > rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf); -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com