On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 06:31:05PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 9 August 2017 at 13:05, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > This patch adds the core support for switching and managing the SVE > > architectural state of user tasks. [...] > > +static u64 sve_cpacr_trap_on(u64 cpacr) > > +{ > > + return cpacr & ~(u64)CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN; > > +} > > + > > +static u64 sve_cpacr_trap_off(u64 cpacr) > > +{ > > + return cpacr | CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN; > > +} > > + > > +static void change_cpacr(u64 old, u64 new) > > +{ > > + if (old != new) > > + write_sysreg(new, CPACR_EL1); > > +} [...] > > +static void task_fpsimd_load(void) > > +{ > > + if (system_supports_sve() && test_thread_flag(TIF_SVE)) { > > + unsigned int vl = current->thread.sve_vl; > > + > > + BUG_ON(!sve_vl_valid(vl)); > > + sve_load_state(sve_pffr(current), > > + ¤t->thread.fpsimd_state.fpsr, > > + sve_vq_from_vl(vl) - 1); > > + } else > > + fpsimd_load_state(¤t->thread.fpsimd_state); > > + > > Please use braces consistently on all branches of an if () > > > + if (system_supports_sve()) { > > + u64 cpacr = read_sysreg(CPACR_EL1); > > + u64 new_cpacr; > > + > > + /* Toggle SVE trapping for userspace if needed */ > > + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SVE)) > > + new_cpacr = sve_cpacr_trap_off(cpacr); > > + else > > + new_cpacr = sve_cpacr_trap_on(cpacr); > > + > > + change_cpacr(cpacr, new_cpacr); > > I understand you want to avoid setting CPACR to the same value, but > this does look a bit clunky IMO. Wouldn't it be much better to have a > generic accessor with a mask and a value that encapsulates this? For this I now have: static void change_cpacr(u64 val, u64 mask) { u64 cpacr = read_sysreg(CPACR_EL1); u64 new = (cpacr & ~mask) | val; if (new != cpacr) write_sysreg(new, CPACR_EL1); } static void sve_cpacr_trap_on(void) { change_cpacr(0, CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN); } static void sve_cpacr_trap_off(void) { change_cpacr(CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN, CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN); } This is stilla little verbose, but fairly clean. Possibly this was the sort of thing you meant by a generic accessor. What do you think? [...] Cheers ---Dave