On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I really don't think that struct pt_regs is part of uapi and should be > exported. We did change the layout of the pt_regs structure more than once > and would like to be able to do so in the future as well. On some architectures, pt_regs is definitely part of the uapi, as we define sigcontext in terms of pt_regs: arch/cris/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h: struct pt_regs regs; /* needs to be first */ arch/m32r/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h: struct pt_regs *sc_pt_regs; arch/microblaze/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h: struct pt_regs regs; arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h: struct pt_regs __user *regs; arch/tile/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h: * struct sigcontext has the same shape as struct pt_regs, arch/unicore32/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h: struct pt_regs regs; On other architectures, they just use the same layout but different names. arm32 also uses pt_regs in struct kvm_regs, the other ones don't: arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h: struct pt_regs usr_regs; /* R0_usr - R14_usr, PC, CPSR */ > In addition what about compat processes? Most architectures define their > struct pt_regs with "unsigned long" members, which have different sizes for > 32/64 bit, while the structure on the kernel stack contains 64 bit > members. And as far as I know the bpf test cases want to access the kernel > stack, no? Then this seems to be broken also. Right. Arnd