Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount overflow protection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:12:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +#define ASM_UNREACHABLE                                                        \
> > +       "999: .pushsection .discard.unreachable\n\t"                    \
> > +       ".long 999b - .\n\t"                                            \
> > +       ".popsection\n\t"
> 
> Will this end up running into the same bug fixed with
> 3d1e236022cc1426b0834565995ddee2ca231cee and the __LINE__ macro? I
> could tell under which conditions gcc would do this kind of merging...

I hope not, but objtool should complain about it if it does.

We could involve the __LINE__ macro, or some other way to make the
labels unique, but that might complicate the code a bit, so we can delay
doing that unless necessary.

-- 
Josh



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux