There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics, and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific arch_spin_unlock_wait(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h index f7838ecd83c6..217ee5210c32 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h @@ -98,13 +98,6 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lp) : "cc", "memory"); } -static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock) -{ - while (arch_spin_is_locked(lock)) - arch_spin_relax(lock); - smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep(); -} - /* * Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers * but only one writer. -- 2.5.2