On 24/06/17 10:14 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > So you would prefer a function containing BUG? Don't be so obtuse. Of course not. > Because I have to have *something* to put into the machvec function > pointer. Well I can't say I understand the point of the machvec code, but if you're saying it's impossible to have the Jensen sub-arch not supply a 64bit io functions then, fine, leave it as is. Logan
