On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:49:10 +0200 > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:21:16 +0200 >> > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> >> I'm building on top of yesterday's linux-next at the moment, >> with a number of my own patches applied >> >> > I can take a look at ARM and try to get it at least to parity with >> > incremental link. Any particular config options required? >> >> This is the patch I am testing with: >> >> https://pastebin.com/HQuhCEmK >> I have not looked at that in a while, no idea if it works, or >> if it has known problems. >> >> I last posted the patch in March for discussion: >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9626207/ > > Well I just mean the stuff now in kbuild/thin-ac, not the LD_DCDE. > Just want to try getting thin archives up to a point where there are > no serious regressions first. For my build testing, I have now reverted most of my patch and only left the 'select THIN_ARCHIVES'. I'll let you know if I run into problems. Arnd
