Re: [PATCH v2] refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Davidlohr,

On 06/08/2017 10:09 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:

Yes, this would be a prerequisite for ipc; which I initially thought didn't
take a performance hit.

Did you see a regression for ipc?

The fast paths don't use the refcount, it is only used for rare situations:
- GETALL, SETALL for large arrays
- alloc undo

--
    Manfred



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux