On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 05:00:07PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> Now with iommu probe deferral, we return -EPROBE_DEFER
> for master's that are connected to an iommu which is not
s/master's/masters/
s/iommu/IOMMU/ in your English text (changelogs and comments). That seems
to be the convention, based on "git log drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c"
> probed yet, but going to get probed, so that we can attach
> the correct dma_ops. So while trying to defer the probe of
> the master, check if the of_iommu node that it is connected
> to is marked in DT as 'status=disabled', then the iommu is never
> is going to get probed. So simply return NULL and let the master
> work without an iommu.
>
> Fixes: 7b07cbefb68d ("iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error")
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Magnus Damn <magnus.damn@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> index 9f44ee8..e6e9bec 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static bool of_iommu_driver_present(struct device_node *np)
>
> ops = iommu_ops_from_fwnode(fwnode);
> if ((ops && !ops->of_xlate) ||
> + !of_device_is_available(iommu_spec->np) ||
> (!ops && !of_iommu_driver_present(iommu_spec->np)))
> return NULL;
>
> --
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
