On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:11:42PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > It's not impossible to review; the problem is in figuring out which codepaths > are hot enough to worry about them. And I'm even more convinced that > bulk search-and-replace is the right approach here; we probably _can_ get ^- not apologies for sloppy editing... > rid of that shit this cycle (or, at least, reduce its use to very few places > in arch/*), but that'll require some cooperation from architecture maintainers.
