On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... and sure enough, on generic kernel (CONFIG_ITANIUM) that yields a nice > shiny oops at precisely that insn. The right fix here might be to delete all the CONFIG_ITANIUM paths. I doubt that anyone is still running upstream kernels on Merced CPUs (and if they are, it might be a kindness to them to make them stop). > We really need tests for uaccess primitives. That's not a recent regression, > BTW - it had been that way since 2.3.48-pre2, as far as I can see. Probably be handy for new architectures to test all the corner cases. -Tony
