On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:38:17AM +0800, Cao jin wrote: > On 03/29/2017 12:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 04:35:07PM +0800, Cao jin wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I'm not sure. I think I used it during development and it's not like > > it costs anything to keep. > > It easily confusing newbies without any comments for its purpose. percpu variable handling is pretty complex to begin with. I don't buy that an empty default attribute macro adds anything noticeable there. > Temporary using during development seems not good to persist. Could I > know its purpose? I don't remember the exact details but at the same time I don't see the value of the proposed change. We can apply or not apply the patch and either way wouldn't make any noticeable difference. What's the point? Thanks. -- tejun
