On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 17:54 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > It's not so much "broken" as "not currently supported". Yeah, I thought that when I inherited the commit, but didn't get as far as rephrasing it. Will do so. > [...] > > > > > +#define HAVE_PCI_MMAP > > +extern int pci_mmap_page_range(struct pci_dev *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > + enum pci_mmap_state mmap_state, int write_combine); > > + > Per the prior attempt at this [1], we only want to expose the sysfs > interface, and not the legacy procfs interface, and need the two > decoupled [2]. I do not like that idea. The procfs horridness is legacy, sure, but it's not actually an arch-specific interface. You get to mess with 'legacy' syscalls all you like on a new architecture, but there could exist arch-agnostic code which uses the procfs interface, surely? > > + if (write_combine) > > + vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_writecombine(vma->vm_page_prot); > > + else > > + vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot); > ... as per Will's comment in [3], the latter of these should use > pgprot_device. Will fix that; thanks.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
