Re: [RFC, PATCHv1 15/28] x86: detect 5-level paging support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 07:21:37PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> 5-level paging support is required from hardware when compiled with
> CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y. We may implement runtime switch support later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

...

> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c b/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c
> index 6687ab953257..26e9a287805f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,17 @@ static inline void cpuid(u32 id, u32 *a, u32 *b, u32 *c, u32 *d)
>  	);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void cpuid_count(u32 id, u32 count,
> +		u32 *a, u32 *b, u32 *c, u32 *d)
> +{
> +	asm volatile(".ifnc %%ebx,%3 ; movl  %%ebx,%3 ; .endif	\n\t"
> +		     "cpuid					\n\t"
> +		     ".ifnc %%ebx,%3 ; xchgl %%ebx,%3 ; .endif	\n\t"
> +		    : "=a" (*a), "=c" (*c), "=d" (*d), EBX_REG (*b)
> +		    : "a" (id), "c" (count)
> +	);
> +}

Pls make those like cpuid() and cpuid_count() in
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h, which explicitly assign ecx and then
call the underlying helper.

The cpuid() in cpuflags.c doesn't zero ecx which, if we have to be
pedantic, it should do. It calls CPUID now with the ptr value of its 4th
on 64-bit and 3rd arg on 32-bit, respectively, IINM.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux