On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:34:23PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:33:15PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > > New aarch32 ptrace syscall handler is introduced to avoid run-time > > detection of the task type. > > What's wrong with the run-time detection? If it's just to avoid a > negligible overhead, I would rather keep the code simpler by avoiding > duplicating the generic compat_sys_ptrace(). Nothing wrong. This is how Arnd asked me to do. You already asked this question: http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1604.3/00930.html If it's still looking weird to you, I can switch back to runtime ptrace. But I'd like to see Arnd's opinion. Yury. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
