On 09/16/2016 10:57 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Implementing busy wait loops with cpu_relax() in callers poses
> some difficulties for powerpc.
>
> First, we want to put our SMT thread into a low priority mode for the
> duration of the loop, but then return to normal priority after exiting
> the loop. Dependong on the CPU design, 'HMT_low() ; HMT_medium();' as
> cpu_relax() does may have HMT_medium take effect before HMT_low made
> any (or much) difference.
>
> Second, it can be beneficial for some implementations to spin on the
> exit condition with a statically predicted-not-taken branch (i.e.,
> always predict the loop will exit).
>
> This is a quick RFC with a couple of users converted to see what
> people think. I don't use a C branch with hints, because we don't want
> the compiler moving the loop body out of line, which makes it a bit
> messy unfortunately. If there's a better way to do it, I'm all ears.
>
> I would not propose to switch all callers immediately, just some
> core synchronisation primitives.
Just a FYA,
On s390 we have a private version of cpu_relax that yields the cpu
time slice back to the hypervisor via a hypercall. As this turned out
to be problematic in some cases there is also now a cpu_relax_lowlatency.
Now, this seems still problematic as there are too many places still
using cpu_relax instead of cpu_relax_lowlatency. So my plan is to do
a change of that, make cpu_relax just be a barrier and add a new
cpu_relax_yield that gives up the time slice. (so that s390 cpu_relax
is just like any other cpu_relax)
As far as I can tell the only place where I want to change cpu_relax
to cpu_relax_lowlatency after that change is the stop machine run
code, so I hope to have no conflicts with your changes.
>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 7 ++-----
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h | 5 ++---
> include/linux/cgroup.h | 7 ++-----
> include/linux/seqlock.h | 10 ++++------
> 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> index 68e3bf5..e10aee2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -402,6 +402,28 @@ static inline unsigned long __pack_fe01(unsigned int fpmode)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> #define cpu_relax() do { HMT_low(); HMT_medium(); barrier(); } while (0)
> +
> +#define spin_do \
> +do { \
> + HMT_low(); \
> + __asm__ __volatile__ ( "1010:");
> +
> +#define spin_while(cond) \
> + barrier(); \
> + __asm__ __volatile__ ( "cmpdi %0,0 \n\t" \
> + "beq- 1010b \n\t" \
> + : : "r" (cond)); \
> + HMT_medium(); \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +#define spin_until(cond) \
> + barrier(); \
> + __asm__ __volatile__ ( "cmpdi %0,0 \n\t" \
> + "bne- 1010b \n\t" \
> + : : "r" (cond)); \
> + HMT_medium(); \
> +} while (0)
> +
> #else
> #define cpu_relax() barrier()
> #endif
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> index fe297b5..4c53b3a 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> @@ -235,12 +235,9 @@ do { \
> #define smp_cond_load_acquire(ptr, cond_expr) ({ \
> typeof(ptr) __PTR = (ptr); \
> typeof(*ptr) VAL; \
> - for (;;) { \
> + spin_do { \
> VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR); \
> - if (cond_expr) \
> - break; \
> - cpu_relax(); \
> - } \
> + } spin_until (cond_expr); \
> smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep(); \
> VAL; \
> })
> diff --git a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
> index 3b5bafc..695743c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
> @@ -25,9 +25,8 @@ static inline void bit_spin_lock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
> #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)
> while (unlikely(test_and_set_bit_lock(bitnum, addr))) {
> preempt_enable();
> - do {
> - cpu_relax();
> - } while (test_bit(bitnum, addr));
> + spin_do {
> + } spin_while (test_bit(bitnum, addr));
> preempt_disable();
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> index 984f73b..e7d395f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> @@ -450,12 +450,9 @@ task_get_css(struct task_struct *task, int subsys_id)
> struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - while (true) {
> + spin_do {
> css = task_css(task, subsys_id);
> - if (likely(css_tryget_online(css)))
> - break;
> - cpu_relax();
> - }
> + } spin_until (likely(css_tryget_online(css)));
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return css;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> index ead9765..93ed609 100644
> --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> @@ -108,12 +108,10 @@ static inline unsigned __read_seqcount_begin(const seqcount_t *s)
> {
> unsigned ret;
>
> -repeat:
> - ret = READ_ONCE(s->sequence);
> - if (unlikely(ret & 1)) {
> - cpu_relax();
> - goto repeat;
> - }
> + spin_do {
> + ret = READ_ONCE(s->sequence);
> + } spin_while (unlikely(ret & 1));
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
