On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 10:29:18 PM CEST Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Hi Michal, > > I ended up deciding to do a v3, because I had several changes > accumulated, as described in patches. > > I've also left off the powerpc arch patches -- they can be found > in previous posts, for reference. > > I've again tested ARM and it seems to be building okay and without > performance regression with my configurations. I think it's going > to be a matter of some toolchain options for them to go through. > arm64, x86, powerpc, and arm for me all built fine with thin archives > and --gc-sections enabled, so I can't see there being a fundamental > issue that can't be solved. Worst case, the incremental link option > can remain for a time. > I clearly want to use this on ARM, and I am still investigating the performance regression that I see on my build box, but that is no reason to delay your patches. Everything looks good to me, Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
