Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] tools: add linker table userspace sandbox

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/19/2016 04:41 PM, mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Please let me know if there are any issue or questions.

Only that this has been the majority of the traffic on the linux-sh
mailing list for over a month and I'm still not sure why anyone should care.

I have no idea what problem it solves, despite reading a couple dozen
messages in the thread, and the most recent two 0/x intro messages. Its
purpose seems to be ensuring that lld.llvm.org has more work to do if it
ever wants to build the kernel without binutils?

I also am not certain why every revision of it is cc'd to linux-sh. Is
it generic linker infrastructure change, or is it something that affects
this architecture specifically? As far as I can tell nothing in this
most recent 7-patch series touches arch/sh at all, you just cc'd our
list because you think the work you're doing is _important_, not that
it's specifically relevant to us.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux