On 07/25/2016 09:32 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know really it is compatible with GPLv2, > and if it is, I'm not sure the reason why we need another license. > AFAICS the license terms, most of parts looks reasonable. I just concern > clause 8, after fifteen years, is that still GPLv2 compatible? > (I'd like see FAQ about this license...) Yes, after fifteen years the restrictions in the license that make it copyleft rather than permissive disappear, and the license is transformed into a simple, essentially unconditional, permissive open source license. Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
