On Wed, 6 Jul 2016, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote: > correct or not. After learn and compare some fuzz tools, I feel that there is > no such fuzz tools could help me. So, I wrote a new fuzz tools base on the > trinity and it found several wrapper issues in glibc. I will first explain the > different with existing fuzz tools and paste my propsosal in the end. I'm not at all clear on whether any of the people working on AArch64 ILP32 glibc have run the glibc testsuite and investigated the results in detail (the patch submissions have failed to include glibc testsuite results and have included bugs that would have been detected by the glibc testsuite). But, if you've found bugs in a new glibc port that were not detected by the existing testsuite, then tests for those bugs should be contributed to glibc (even if no existing port has those bugs, improving the test coverage is still a good idea). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
