On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We currently keep every task's stack around until the task_struct
> itself is freed. This means that we keep the stack allocation alive
> for longer than necessary and that, under load, we free stacks in
> big batches whenever RCU drops the last task reference. Neither of
> these is good for reuse of cache-hot memory, and freeing in batches
> prevents us from usefully caching small numbers of vmalloced stacks.
>
> On architectures that have thread_info on the stack, we can't easily
> change this, but on architectures that set THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK, we
> can free it as soon as the task is dead.
This is broken:
> -void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +void release_task_stack(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> account_kernel_stack(tsk, -1);
> arch_release_thread_stack(tsk->stack);
> free_thread_stack(tsk);
> + tsk->stack = NULL;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
> + tsk->stack_vm_area = NULL;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +#ifndef CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
> + /*
> + * The task is finally done with both the stack and thread_info,
> + * so free both.
> + */
> + release_task_stack(tsk);
> +#else
> + /*
> + * If the task had a separate stack allocation, it should be gone
> + * by now.
> + */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->stack);
> +#endif
We can get to free_task without first going through TASK_DEAD if we
fail to clone(). I'm inclined to make release_task_stack be safe to
call more than once and to call it unconditionally in free_task, since
doing it without branches (calling release_task_stack in the
copy_process failure path) will require more ifdeffery and sounds like
more trouble than it's worth.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
