Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:08:27PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
>> > #ifdef CONFIG_RMW_INSNS
>> >
>> > +/*
>> > + * Am I reading these CAS loops right in that %2 is the old value and the first
>> > + * iteration uses an uninitialized value?
>> > + *
>> > + * Would it not make sense to add: tmp = atomic_read(v); to avoid this?
>> > + */
>> > +
>> > #define ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op, c_op, asm_op) \
>> > static inline int atomic_##op##_return(int i, atomic_t *v) \
>> > { \
>>
>> Do we want the above comment in the code?
>
> I figured it would not hurt; is this indeed the case, do we want to fix
> it?
No, there is nothing to fix here.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
