On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > index 54a8e65..eadd7a3 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static inline void queued_read_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
> > */
> > static inline void queued_write_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
> > {
> > - smp_store_release((u8 *)&lock->cnts, 0);
> > + (void)atomic_sub_return_release(_QW_LOCKED, &lock->cnts);
> > }
>
> Isn't this more expensive than the existing version?
Yes, loads. And while this might be a suitable fix for asm-generic, it
will introduce a fairly large regression on x86 (which is currently the
only user of this).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
