On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:25:14PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:58:28AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 04:36:42PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > Is it a good time for that now? I would hope identifying proper > > > aliasing uses for memremap() might be a bit easier now than for > > > ioremap() given its not used as widely. It may be an easier target to > > > also write some grammar rules for it as well. > > > > So you want an explicit opt-in flag to allow aliasing? Sounds fine to > > me. > > Yup! Can the default then safely already be no-aliasing then? Or if aliasing is truly not needed as often a different API, this maybe useful later if we pick up again module namespace stuff. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html