Re: [PATCH 01/23] all: syscall wrappers: add documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 1:50:39 PM CEST David Miller wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 22:47:33 +0200
> 
> > If we use the normal calling conventions, we could remove these overrides
> > along with the respective special-case handling in glibc. None of them
> > look particularly performance-sensitive, but I could be wrong there.
> 
> You could set the lowest bit in the system call entry pointer to indicate
> the upper-half clears should be elided.

Right, but that would introduce an extra conditional branch in the syscall
hotpath, and likely eliminate the gains from passing the loff_t arguments
in a single register instead of a pair.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux