On 4/28/2016 9:24 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
From: Michal Hocko<mhocko@xxxxxxxx> __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations. pgtable_alloc_one uses __GFP_REPEAT flag for L2_USER_PGTABLE_ORDER but the order is either 0 or 3 if L2_KERNEL_PGTABLE_SHIFT for HPAGE_SHIFT. This means that this flag has never been actually useful here because it has always been used only for PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests. Cc: Chris Metcalf<cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc:linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko<mhocko@xxxxxxxx> --- arch/tile/mm/pgtable.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
This seems OK as far as I can tell from code review. Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [for tile] -- Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies http://www.mellanox.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
