Re: [PATCH 04/20] arm: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 03:23:50PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
> around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.
> 
> PGALLOC_GFP uses __GFP_REPEAT but none of the allocation which uses
> this flag is for more than order-2. This means that this flag has never
> been actually useful here because it has always been used only for
> PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests.

I'm unconvinced.  Back in 2013, I was seeing a lot of failures, so:

commit 8c65da6dc89ccb605d73773b1dd617e72982d971
Author: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Sat Nov 30 12:52:31 2013 +0000

    ARM: pgd allocation: retry on failure

    Make pgd allocation retry on failure; we really need this to succeed
    otherwise fork() can trigger OOMs.

    Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Maybe something has changed again in the MM layer which makes this flag
unnecessary again, and it was a temporary blip around that time, I don't
know.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux