Re: [RFC][PATCH 22/31] locking,tile: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/26/2016 11:28 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:54:34PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
Otherwise, though just based on code inspection so far:

Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [for tile]
Thanks!

Just to verify; the new fetch-op thingies _do_ indeed need the extra
smp_mb() as per my patch, because there is no trailing instruction
depending on the completion of the load?

Exactly.  I should have said so explicitly :-)

--
Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies
http://www.mellanox.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux