Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/31] locking,hexagon: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 04:16:58AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:04:23AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +#define ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op)						\
> > +static inline int atomic_fetch_##op(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
> > +{									\
> > +	int output, val;						\
> > +									\
> > +	__asm__ __volatile__ (						\
> > +		"1:	%0 = memw_locked(%2);\n"			\
> > +		"	%1 = "#op "(%0,%3);\n"				\
> > +		"	memw_locked(%2,P3)=%0;\n"			\
> 
> I'm thinking that wants to be:
> 
> 			memw_locked(%2,P3)=%1;
> 
> > +		"	if !P3 jump 1b;\n"				\
> > +		: "=&r" (output), "=&r" (val)				\
> > +		: "r" (&v->counter), "r" (i)				\
> > +		: "memory", "p3"					\
> > +	);								\
> > +	return output;							\
> > +}

I think you are right.  With the above fix,

Acked-by: Richard Kuo <rkuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, 
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux