Re: [RFC][PATCH 19/31] locking,s390: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:06:25AM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:04:32 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
> > existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
> > value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.
> > 
> > This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
> > bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
> > to modification).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h |   42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> That looks good, the code compiles and the functions are generated correctly.
> We will know for sure if it works after the first user of these new functions
> hit the kernel.

So we already have an atomic_fetch_or() user in the kernel, and this
series adds an atomic_fetch_add_acquire() user.

But yes, we'll undoubtedly grow more over time :-)

> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux