Re: [PATCH 01/31] bitops: add parity functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



OK, I will do the V2 patches soon.
In addition, the best is to provide asm version parity functions for powerpc, sparc, and x86.

在 2016年03月28日 01:56, Sam Ravnborg 写道:
Any particular reason that you select one approach over the other
in the different cases?
No particular reason, just like the architecture's __arch_hweightN.
The general recommendatiosn these days are to use static inline
for code to get better type check.
And it would also be nice to be consistent across architectures.

	Sam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux