* Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed 09-03-16 14:17:10, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > [...] this is a follow up work for oom_reaper [1]. As the async OOM killing > > > > depends on oom_sem for read we would really appreciate if a holder for write > > > > stood in the way. This patchset is changing many of down_write calls to be > > > > killable to help those cases when the writer is blocked and waiting for > > > > readers to release the lock and so help __oom_reap_task to process the oom > > > > victim. > > > > > > > > there seems to be a misunderstanding: if a writer is blocked waiting for > > > > readers then no new readers are allowed - the writer will get its turn the > > > > moment all existing readers drop the lock. > > > > > > Readers might be blocked e.g. on the memory allocation which cannot proceed due > > > to OOM. Such a reader might be operating on a remote mm. > > > > Doing complex allocations with the mm locked looks fragile no matter what: we > > should add debugging code that warns if allocations are done with a remote mm > > locked. (it should be trivial) > > No matter how fragile is that it is not something non-existent. Just > have a look at use_mm for example. We definitely do not want to warn > about those, right? Sure we care about eliminating fragility, and usage does not seem to be widespread at all: triton:~/tip> git grep -w use_mm drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_sdma.c: use_mm(req->pq->user_mm); drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c: use_mm(io_data->mm); drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/inode.c: use_mm(mm); drivers/vhost/vhost.c: use_mm(dev->mm); I think we also want to keep our general flexibility wrt. eventually turning the mmap_sem into a spinlock ... > > > I am not against interruptible variant as well but I suspect that some paths > > > are not expected to return EINTR. I haven't checked them for this but > > > killable is sufficient for the problem I am trying to solve. That problem is > > > real while latencies do not seem to be that eminent. > > > > If they don't expect EINTR then they sure don't expect SIGKILL either! > > Why? Each syscall already is killable as the task might be killed by the OOM > killer. Not all syscalls are interruptible - for example sys_sync() isn't: SYSCALL_DEFINE0(sync) { int nowait = 0, wait = 1; wakeup_flusher_threads(0, WB_REASON_SYNC); iterate_supers(sync_inodes_one_sb, NULL); iterate_supers(sync_fs_one_sb, &nowait); iterate_supers(sync_fs_one_sb, &wait); iterate_bdevs(fdatawrite_one_bdev, NULL); iterate_bdevs(fdatawait_one_bdev, NULL); if (unlikely(laptop_mode)) laptop_sync_completion(); return 0; } > > There's a (very) low number of system calls that are not interruptible, but > > the vast majority is. > > That might be true. I just fail to see how this is related to the > particular problem I am trying to solve. As I've said those callsites > which cause problems with latencies can be later converted to > interruptible waiting trivially. So my problem as I see it is the following: you are adding a rare API to an already complex locking interface, further complicating already complicated MM code paths in various ways. Only to help a case that is a third type of rare: OOM-kill. That's a surefire whack-a-mole nest of bugs, if I've ever seen one. What I am suggesting instead is a slight modification of the concept: to re-phrase the problem set and think in broader terms of interruptability: make certain MM operations, especially ones which tend to hinder OOM-kill latencies, more interruptible - which implicitly also makes them more OOM-killable. That's a win-win as I see it: as both your usecase and a lot of other usecases will be improved - and it will also be tested a lot more than any OOM-kill path will be tested. I might be wrong in the end, but your counterarguments were not convincing so far (to me). Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html